• Feed

  • « | Main | »

    JohnChow.com Review online on batch 57

    By maurizio | April 14, 2007

    John Chow has just published his batch 57 of reviews and he put mine there. It’s not a real review, it’s just some old joke translated for the web. I wanted to use it on the web hoping that he liked it enough to comment it somewhere. My idea was that someone will use it on some other website, just like a small viral joke. :)
    As usual, I am not very lucky, because he posted it as a a review on Saturday/Sunday, while a lot of people don’t care about internet and prefer to go out. Second reason I’m not lucky, I probably forgot to mention the caption for the link, so he’s using a simple “Nafurai”, which is not as interesting as “JohnChow.com shortest review ever”. I hope he will see my email and change that thing.
    Anyway someone (apart from him that I think he read it twice on 2 different days), some 15 people decided to read it anyway. I can see it on getclicky.com that most of them spent less than a minute on it.That’s normal. If you need more than a minute to read my review, you need to learn english a bit more. The strange thing is that no one clicked my related stories to see the explanation of my post and almost no one read some other posts.

    I also noticed that people still like my story about the Lego’s Nintendo Wii, the story about Lorem Ipsum meaning and my World of Warcraft vs. Microsof’s Wow joke.
    Firefox Network Pipelining is still my best article even if it’s not as read as Lorem Ipsum’s one. I prefer it because I really had to work on the content and not just have fun on something.

    Two things I’ve learned today: one is that I should continue to link my own post; the second thing is that I should change the caption of “Related Posts” (and add a hint on my review about it).

    Topics: Content Creation, Ramblings | No Comments »

    Read other related posts:

  • JohnChow.com shortest review ever
  • JohnChow.com shortest review explanation: create content
  • Jakeldaily.com review
  • Comments

    Subscribe without commenting