• Feed

  • Sponsors

  • Clicky Ranking

    31905
    Ranking by getClicky.com

  • « Visitors Loyalty and Site goals | Main | .Edu link spam »

    Jakeldaily.com review

    By maurizio | May 4, 2007

    If you are new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Feel free to leave comments and questions too.Thanks for visiting!

    Jason Neuman from jakeldaily.com wants to make money. He contacted me to write a short review just to create some link love :-). He clearly copied John Chow’s idea but added his own piece to the game. I am reviewing his site and he will do the same with mine.
    I browsed for a while their site (Jason and Kelly’s, Jason’s wife) and I’ve found it a bit too similar to JohnChow.com. I am not speaking about the theme, the real problem is the content. Most of the post I’ve read have the same content of JohnChow.com or some other blog I’ve read somewhere else. This happens when the blog is so young.
    By digging deeper I discovered some interesting post though and, the most important of all, I’ve discovered that he has good writing skills. I would love to write like him.

    Note that that my site isn’t better than theirs..

    Topics: Internet |

    Read other related posts:

  • I’ve been accepted by ReviewMe
  • JohnChow.com Review online on batch 57
  • JohnChow.com shortest review explanation: create content
  • 3 Responses to “Jakeldaily.com review”

    1. Jason Neuman Says: MyAvatars 0.2
      May 4th, 2007 at 9:50 am

      Thank you for the review and I have returned the favor batch 9

    2. Paula Neal Mooney Says: MyAvatars 0.2
      May 5th, 2007 at 2:57 pm

      Oh boy.

      Seems like Jason hates when people say his blog is like John Chow’s!

      But such is life…

    3. maurizio Says: MyAvatars 0.2
      May 5th, 2007 at 3:03 pm

      Yeah Paula, I read it. But he doesn’t like when people say it about his template… I was speaking about some of the content he writes. I see it because I think it’s the same problem I have sometimes.

      Btw, do you read this? I always wonder if someone ever read comments and comments-about-comments..

    Comments

    Subscribe without commenting